![]() ![]() Hits in the forward hemisphere will now be more likely to damage control rods as well as other internal modules of the aircraft. Now depending on the angle, a close burst of a guided missile or a hit in the rear hemisphere results more often in damage or failure of one of the engines rather than both at once. ![]() At the same time damage to the front of the fuselage didn’t result in any significant damage to the aircraft. On the example of Su-25 and A-10 we want to tell you about the results of this work.Ī-10A tended to frequently tear off the tail section of the fuselage and destroy both engines. ![]() Some of the corrections will also involve refining the damage models for other aircraft from kinetic hits from close bursts of guided missiles and artillery rounds. We carefully studied the damage scenarios for these attack aircraft, found problems and fixed them. Hi there! Recently we received several reports on possible problems with attackers of the Su-25 and A-10A series - players complained about oddities in the damage model of these aircraft, in particular from damage by the striking elements of the anti-aircraft missiles. Now we will tell you about what problems we found and how we solved them. We received feedback from players about possible problems with damage models of the top attackers Su-25 and A-10A. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |